<div class="comment_entry">
One question that still remains for me, is whether to revise an old post in place or to add a new post linking back to the old post.
Writing a new post will have the advantage of internal links new to old post and old to new post. Revising the old post will make it comfortable for all readers who set bookmarks (favorites) to the old post in their bookmarking tool or browser. In the case of a new post and a link to it from the old post the reader has to read the old post partially to find the link to the new one (maybe he/she doesn't), then they have to follow the link. This can be experienced as a detour.
In today's challenge I did not take an old post, actually it was yesterday’s post. Yesterday I had made rather quickly a link list post to reliable places (not news), where you can find information about the swine flu. http://info.ulrich-schrader.de/node/643
Today I have been adding new links including a map with the confirmed (strongly suspected) cases from reliable sources and also restructured the post. I decided to revise the "old" post since it was rather new, and I wanted people to favorite it. Good decision?
</div>